Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Book Review: Keith Lowe’s Savage Continent

            Keith Lowe’s Savage Continent provides excellent commentary on the dangers of distorting history.  However, he frequently repeats commonly accepted distortions.  When discussing the bombing of Hamburg he states, “the statistics were not reliable.  In a city where bodies were concealed beneath a mountain of rubble, where some had been
fused together by the intense heat while others were reduced to mere ashes, it was impossible to measure the number of dead with any kind of precision.”  Yet, when discussing the bombing of Dresden he states the claims of 100,000 deaths are refuted by “most reliable sources” who put the figure at 20,000.  Over ninety percent of Dresden’s city center was destroyed.  It’s population had swelled to approximately 1.2 million with mostly women and children refugees fleeing the Red Army.  U.S. and British bombers had dropped 650,000 incendiaries on the city creating a firestorm.  Anyone looking at photographs of the rubble and believing it resulted it only 20,000 fatalities cannot be serious.  People claiming that Dresden was bombed for military reasons are not aware that the city’s military borough, the Albertstadt, was never targeted.
            Lowe minimizes the atrocities committed during the expulsion of Germans from Eastern Europe.  He makes only a brief reference to Henry Morgenthau who was instrumental in forming U.S. postwar policy.  He makes no mention of Harry Dexter White, the author of the Morgenthau Plan and a Soviet agent of influence.  This plan was devised by White to push the rest of Europe into the arms of the Soviets.  Lowe does not believe that Europe was on the verge of going Communist.  Most foreign policy experts believe the opposite.  Lowe claims “McCarthy’s portrayal of American Communists . . . was every bit as irrational as eastern Europe’s anti-Americanism.”  Senator McCarthy had no idea of how extensive Communist infiltration was.   His fears were far from irrational.

            There is an acceptable narrative that must not be contradicted.  Lowe mentions author John Sack who wrote a book about atrocities committed by Jewish prison camp officials in Poland.  Sack’s agent refused to represent the book and his published who had paid for the book decided not to publish it.  Lowe states, “like James Bacque’s book about German POWs, was considered dangerous precisely because it contained seeds of truth.”  The 1978 edition of the Guinness Book of World Records has a category for Mass Killings.  It placed Adolf Hitler in third place after Mao and Stalin.  The category did not appear in subsequent editions.  Clearly there is an effort to suppress information that does not conform to this narrative.  My own work on the Morgenthau Plan deserves more coverage than it has received.

Sunday, September 4, 2016

Book Review: Bloodlands - Europe Between Hitler and Stalin by Timothy Snyder



Having read extensively about the Second World War and its aftermath, I have become exceedingly skeptical of everything I read.  Seventy years is not long enough for the passions aroused by this war to subside enough to allow an objective report of what transpired.  The Peloponnesian War undoubtedly aroused passion.  However, no one today would suggest that that war be continued.  Perhaps in another 2500 years the events surrounding this period will be viewed more objectively.  Until then all accounts should be viewed with a certain amount of skepticism.

It is unlikely, but possible, that Snyder wrote an account void of error.  However, his account conflicts with many other sources.  Snyder gives a figure of 21,892 Poles murdered by the Soviets in what is called the Katyn Forest massacre.  General Pavel Sudoplatov in his book Special Tasks gives a figure of 27,500.  He also provides a memo to Stalin signed by Lavrentiy Beria proposing the execution of the Polish prisoners.

His account of the Lidice massacre is also in conflict with other sources.  He claims, “Its men were shot on the spot, its women sent to the German concentration camp at Ravensbruck, and the children gassed at Chelmno.”  (p.262)  Jan Kaplan and Krystyna Nosarzewska report in Prague: The Turbulent Century that, “153 women and 17 children returned after the war.”  

Snyder appears to minimize the atrocities associated with the expulsion of Germans from the East.  He states, “Much responsibility for the deaths associated with flight and expulsion thus rested with the Nazi regime.”  He spends little time on this section of the “bloodlands.”  He states that the expulsions were not designed to liquidate Germans.  This appears to conflict with Churchill’s view.  In 1943 he told Edvard Benes, “Many (Sudeten) Germans will be killed in your country as well - it cannot be helped and I agree with it.  After a few months we’ll say ‘that’s enough,’ and we shall start on the work of peace: try the guilty men who stayed alive.”  Benes stated, “Woe, woe, woe, thrice woe to the Germans, we will liquidate you!”  

He also claims that Polish communist leader Boleslaw Beirut was not Jewish.  I seem to recall reading that he was.  Again Snyder may be correct in all his assertions.  







Friday, September 2, 2016

Clinton Rally Photos v. Trump Rally Photos

I was going to compare photos of Trump rallies with Clinton rallies.  I googled “Trump rallies” and copied a photo of Trump’s Dallas rally showing quite a few thousand people.  Next I googled “Clinton rallies.”  I saw a couple of photos of crowds as large or larger than the Dallas rally.  I was about to quit saying to myself, “There goes that theory.”  However I took a closer look at the photos and it turns out they were Barney (I call him Barney) Sanders rallies.  Why do they put Sanders rally photos on a Clinton image search? 



Trump Dallas Rally
Sanders Rally under Clinton Rally Images







  My original theory was correct: Trump rallies are significantly larger than Clinton rallies.  To be fair I should have included a photo of a Clinton rally with higher attendance.  Why be fair?  Most of the photos shown by the “mainstream” media are shot at an angle to be advantageous to Clinton.  However here is her Baltimore rally where 5,000 people showed up.  
Clinton Omaha Rally

Clinton Baltimore Rally Early in Campaign
Attendance numbers at political rallies do not necessarily indicate a candidates strength.  However, when the numbers are so dramatically different it will be almost impossible for the loser to steal an election.