Ronald Radosh describes himself as a
non-conservatives do this for various reasons.He continues to disparage Joseph McCarthy.He’s a big fan of Dean (“I will not
turn my back on Alger Hiss”) Acheson.He attacked Diana West for her revelations about Communists in the
seems to doubt the leftist/muslim alliance.He wonders, “how do establishment Republicans . . . come to
act under the sway of Mao and Herbert Marcuse?”Establishment Republicans want to be loved.If embracing Mao makes them loved, so
be it.Some examples: John McCain
claimed, “There’s no moral equivalency between racists & Americans standing
up to defy hate&bigotry.The
President of the United States should say so.”Mitt Romney tweeted, “No, not the same.One side is racist, bigoted, Nazi.The other opposes racism and
stated,“Through his statements
yesterday, President Trump took a step backward by again suggesting there is
moral equivalency between the white supremacist neo-Nazis and KKK members who
attended the Charlottesville rally and people like [Heather] Heyer.”Trump specifically referred to Heather
Heyer during his press conference, “I hear she was a fine -- really, actually,
an incredible young woman.”
Radosh condemns Richard Higgins’ “conspiracy”
theory and has Gabriel Schoenfeld describe him as a “crank.”Higgins is therefore not a good
analyst.I suppose Philip Mudd
is.Mudd announced on TV that,
Government is gonna kill this guy.”There are thousands of people in the intel community with a Mudd
The Left will be victorious.They have captured the commanding
heights of our society, but patriots will not go down without a fight.
President Trump may be doomed.The forces against him are
(according to Higgins and any objective observer) “the Mainstream Media, the
Academy, the Deep State created by cultural Marxism, global corporatists and
bankers, the Democrats who protect “cultural Marxist programs of action.”
The recent controversy surrounding the events in
Charlottesville illustrate a problem the media is having with President
Trump.Supporters of the President
will remain with him under almost any circumstance.His opponents will oppose him regardless of what he says. If
he says “good morning” they will manage to find some nefarious motive in his
statement.There are a large
number of people in the middle who can be swayed either way.If they get their information exclusively
from the establishment media they will tend to be critical of the
President.The establishment media
is almost universally opposed to Trump.The problem for the media is that an increasing number of people are
getting their information from the internet. The internet contains a wide
spectrum of information.Much of
it is nonsense. However, it also
contains 100% accurate information.If people want to know what the President said during his press
conference they can read the transcript. Fair minded people can determine for themselves if the
President’s remarks have been distorted.
Much of the criticism of the President revolved
around his condemnation of both sides in the violence in Charlottesville.Trump was asked, “Is the alt-left as
bad as white supremacy?”He
responded, “you had a group on one side that was bad, and you had a group on
the other side that was also very violent.”He continued, “you had a group on the other side that came
charging in, without a permit, and they were very, very violent.”This position is inexcusable.The progressive narrative is that the
Antifa are against hate and are therefore the good guys.This narrative has been accepted by
Trump’s Republican opponents. John
McCain claimed, “There’s no moral equivalency between racists & Americans
standing up to defy hate&bigotry.The President of the United States should say so.”Mitt Romney tweeted, “No, not the
same.One side is racist, bigoted,
Nazi.The other opposes racism and
stated,“Through his statements
yesterday, President Trump took a step backward by again suggesting there is
moral equivalency between the white supremacist neo-Nazis and KKK members who
attended the Charlottesville rally and people like [Heather] Heyer.”
Are the organizations attacking the alt-right
respectable groups worthy of support by Republican senators?Protesters frequently wear masks to
conceal their identity.They often
use symbols of Che Guevara and Mao Zedong as fashion statements. They
frequently carry flags from an ideology responsible for the deaths of perhaps 100
million people.They routinely
riot at G20 summits, causing extensive property damage.Perhaps the two groups are not morally
equivalent.It may be that the
“Antifa” are more destructive than the alt-right groups.
Donald Trump has repeatedly condemned the alt-right
groups during his press conferences: “I’ve condemned neo-Nazis. Neo-Nazis and
the white nationalists . . . should be condemned totally.It looked like they had some rough, bad
people -- neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.”The President mentioned those who
attended the protest who were not extremists but attended because they opposed
the removal of historic monuments.He remarked, “you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and
white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely
unfairly.”Is this sentence
unclear?He states, “other than
neo-Nazis and white nationalists.”Yet a reporter immediately asks, “Sir, I just didn’t understand what you
were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly?
I just don’t understand what you were saying.”This question is an indication of a lack of understanding on
the part of the press.Even more incomprehensible
was Lindsey Graham’s comment that the President equated the neo-Nazis with
Heather Heyer, the woman who was killed during the protest.Trump specifically said, “I hear she
was a fine -- really, actually, an incredible young woman.”
The other inexcusable statement by the President
was his claim that “You’re changing history. You’re changing culture.”He said, “So this week it's Robert E.
Lee. I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down. I wonder, is it George
Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you
really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?”When it was pointed out that, “George Washington and Robert
E. Lee are not the same,” he responded that they were both slave owners.The reporter’s claim that Lee and
Washington were not the same implied that after Lee the protests would
end.However there have been news
reports that there are calls for the removal of both Washington and Jefferson
If all the demands of the Antifa were granted
and every last vestige of the Confederacy was remove, would they all return to
their homes and resume their peaceful lives?Everyone knows they would create a new list of demands.Confederate monuments are just a tool
they are using to assert their power.Republican politicians are using them to attack the President.They are either extremely cynical or
need to emphasize the moral depravity of Antifa and questions those
President Trump has committed the unpardonable
sin of implying that the far left is as violent as the far right.This can be a career ender.New York Times Domestic Affairs
Gay Stolberg, may have learned this the hard way.She commented, “The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right.
I saw club-wielding ‘antifa’ beating white nationalists being led out of the
park.”She was immediately
set upon.She had contradicted the
progressive narrative.Perhaps she
can be forgiven because her comments were made early in the dispute.The progressive narrative is that this
was a demonstration by white supremacists, neo-Nazis and KKK protesting
the removal of statues of slaveholders.They were opposed by “civil rights protestors:” defenders of the
American Way. In Sheryl Gay
Stolberg revised comments the protestors were “standing up to hate.”
Even Mitt Romney
endorsed the progressive fairy tale, tweeting, "No, not the same. One side
is racist, bigoted, Nazi. The other opposes racism and bigotry. Morally
Vice President Joe
Biden tweeted simply: "There is only one side. #charlottesville."This narrative has been repeated
endlessly.All demonstrators were
hate advocates.There was nobody
demonstrating against the removal of monuments dedicated to their forebears or
people aware of the left’s true agenda.Perhaps they should have known that an event organized by Richard
Spencer, a known white supremacist, would not be a tea party.
The President’s original statement was, "We
condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred,
bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides.”This allowed critics to suggest he was drawing a moral
equivalency between the right and the left.After massive criticism he appeared to have capitulated.On Monday he condemned the attack and
specifically mentioned the KKK, Neo-Nazis and white supremacists.Unsurprisingly this did not satisfy his
critics. On Tuesday he appeared to
revert to his original position with a vengeance.He asked reporters, “When you say alt-right, define
alt-right for me—what about the alt-left that came charging at the, as you say,
the alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt?”
Trump claimed, “Not all of those people were
He then touched on a problem few conservative
commentators have mentioned.The
entire progressive exercise is based on one goal: the acquisition of
power.He continued, “Many of
those people were there to protest the taking down the statue of Robert E.
Lee.So this week its Robert E Lee
I notice the Stonewall Jackson is coming down.I wonder is it George Washington next week and is it
Thomas Jefferson the week after.You really do have to ask yourself where does it stop.”Al
Sharpton has already targetedThomas
There is not a moral equivalency between left
and right.The left has repeatedly
demonstrated that they are more violent than the Right.The left is held to an entirely
different standard.Black Lives
Matter (“Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon) can be invited to the White
House by President Obama.President Trump can not even criticize them.Mayors often tell their police forces to “stand down.”They give protestors “who wished to destroy space to do that
demonstrations do no usually end with burned out liquor stores.Leftist speakers do not fear being
assaulted when the visit a college campus.The left controls the establishment media.It can therefore suppress or emphasize
information that it believes will further its cause.Che Guevara, Mao, Joseph Stalin and Pol Potdo not receive
the attention they deserve.
President Trump’s exchange with the press at
Trump Tower did not reflect well on the press.The question, “Are you against the Confederacy?” was
entirely ignored.After condemning
white supremacists several times a reported asked, “I didn’t understand what
you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists
unfairly.”Reporters hear what
they want to hear.If they are
incapable of listening they cannot report accurately.
CNN counterterrorism analyst Philip Mudd is retired from a long career in American intelligence. He was in the upper echelons of the intelligence community and was a member of the White House National Security Council. He was appointed by FBI Director Robert Mueller to be the first deputy director of the FBI's National Security Branch in 2005. He was awarded the William Langer Award for excellence in analysis and several Exceptional Performance Awards. He resigned from government service in 2010 and is presently the President of Mudd Management, a company specializing in security consulting.
There is nothing exceptional about Mudd’s career except for the fact that he was a high performer. He obviously was a good fit for the intelligence community. His specialty is analysis. It is therefore strange that he could demonstrate such a lack of judgment when discussing the policies of the President of the United States. On August 11 during the CNN program The Lead with Jake Tapper there was a discussion about Trump’s comments about the Russian expulsion of U.S. diplomats. Mudd responded to the question “what was your response Phil Mudd?” with “As a former government official. Government’s gonna kill this guy.”
Tapper had to interrupt to make sure Mudd was speaking metaphorically. Mudd responded “obviously.” It is unfortunate that members of the entertainment community can “joke” about the President’s severed head. We should expect a great deal more from our intelligence professionals. This is more than an example of poor judgment. Rudd mentions the “deep state.” Referring to this entity as the “deep state” gives it an air of nefarious mystery. There is nothing mysterious about the “deep state.” It is the enormous bureaucracy that has been built up over the years. It has a mind of its own and is remarkably resistant to the interference of elected officials. Philip Mudd is an excellent example of a member of that bureaucracy.
Trump is a threat to this “deep state.” He will attempt to rein it in. However, funding for government programs has not been seriously reduced. Congress (Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell) is still funding wasteful programs and leftist organizations. Republican leadership claims it cannot make progress because that is how government works. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid never used that excuse.
While Mudd spoke approvingly of the government “killing this guy,” Richard Higgins, former NSC Director for Strategic Planning, wrote a memo describing the process the “deep state” is using to remove the President. Higgins paid for his memo with his job. In his seven-page memo he warns of a concerted information warfare campaign designed to remove the President. His memo states, “The Trump administration is suffering under withering information campaigns designed to first undermine, then delegitimize and ultimately remove the president.” “For this cabal, Trump must be destroyed.” Were something happen to the President, Mudd’s irresponsible remarks will come back to haunt him.
Published by American Thinker on Aug 14, 2017 Nazi propagandist Joe Goebbels reportedly said,
“A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the
truth.” Everyone knows that the
Russians interfered in the U.S. election.
When it is discussed on TV it is mentioned without qualification. It is a known and accepted fact. It is on a par with saying the earth is
round. However, ask for
evidence. There is none. There is a dossier. This dossier was so poorly created that
even Vice President Joe Biden believed it was bogus. If you can’t fool Joe Biden you can’t fool
anybody. After months of investigation by thousands of researchers eager to
make a name for themselves the result is zero. However, this does not prevent the assertion from being a
undoubtedly read Sigmund Freud’s nephew, Edward Bernays, book on propaganda.Bernays contended that, “The conscious and intelligent
manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important
element in democratic society.Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an
invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are
governed , our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested,
largely by men we have never heard of."
The power of the
media cannot be overestimated.An
early example of the media’s power was provided by publisher William Randolph Hearst.Hearst sent
the artist Frederic Remington to Cuba in 1897 to cover the insurrection against
Spain.Remington cabled Hearst, “Everything quiet.There is
no trouble here.There will be no
war.Wish to return.”Hearst responded, “Please remain.You furnish the pictures and I’ll
furnish the war.”A short time
later the U.S. was involved in the Spanish-American War.
Perhaps the most
dramatic illustration of the effects of propaganda is American attitudes
towards all things sexual.Bernays
wrote," We are
governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely
by men we have never heard of."In this case we have the names of the architects of a considerable part
of this transformation. Around 1985 social activists Marshall Kirk and Dr. Hunter Madsen began developing a plan to make
homosexuality acceptable. They
wrote an article entitled The Gay Agenda outlining
their strategy to make homosexuality appear narmal.They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.In many locations they have made
When the elite
is preparing the public for war the suffering of children is widely
publicized.Following the invasion
of Kuwait by Iraq Nayirah al-Sabah testified before Congress that she
witnessed Iraqi soldiers taking babies out of incubators leaving them to die.It was later revealed that she was the
daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States and was unlikely
present in Kuwait at the time.Her
testimony was couched by PR firm and “inflamed American public opinion against
attitudes about the flood of migrants reaching their shores have been
influenced by photos of Aylan Kurdi, a Syrian toddler whose body was washed up
on a beach in Turkey.A British paper asserted, "If
these extraordinarily powerful images of a dead Syrian child washed up on a
beach don't change Europe's attitude to refugees, what will?"The tragic death of this child was used
to encourage the entry of thousands of migrants that were far from innocent.
In the Syrian conflict Omran Daqneesh is the child star.His village was allegedly bombed by
pro-Assad forces.“Activists and
aid workers hoped the story would boost international support to help bring an
end to the suffering and fighting in Syria.”Instead of immediately tending to his wounds, Omran was
positioned in an ambulance chair for a photo op.“Television news anchors fought back tears as they broadcast
the video.”This was a direct
appeal to peoples’ emotions.The
implied solution to bring about an end to the suffering in Syria is to
overthrow the Assad regime.This
would be followed by a chaotic situation similar to the situation in Libya.
Economist Stuart Chase suggested, “Theoretically
a society could be completely made over in something like 15 years, the time it
takes to inculcate a new culture into a rising crop of youngsters.” He warned, “Prepare now for a surprising
universe.”Baby boomers have
witnessed four of these 15 year periods.The transition has been extremely gradual and therefore difficult for
some to recognize.However, for
those paying attention the transition has been truly surprising.
This memo was posted on Freerepublic. It is from Richard Higgins who was fired by Gen. McMaster
The Complete Richard Higgins Memo
Circulating | May 2017 | Richard Higgins
Posted on 8/10/2017, 10:17:47 PM by BRK
POTUS & POLITICAL WARFARE
BACKGROUND. The Trump administration is suffering under withering information campaigns designed to first undermine, then de legitimize and ultimately remove the President. Possibly confusing these attacks with an elevated interplay of otherwise normal D.C. partisan infighting and adversarial media relations, the White House response to these campaigns reflects a political advocacy mindset that it is intensely reactive, severely under-inclusive and dangerously inadequate to the threat. If action is not taken to re-scope and respond to these hostile campaigns very soon, the administration risks implosion and subsequent early departure from the White House.
This is not politics as usual but rather political warfare at an unprecedented level that is openly engaged in the direct targeting of a seated president through manipulation of the news cycle. It must be recognized on its own terms so that immediate action can be taken. At its core, these campaigns run on multiple lines of effort, serve as the non-violent line of effort of a wider movement, and execute political warfare agendas that reflect cultural Marxist outcomes. The campaigns operate through narratives. Because the hard left is aligned with lslamist organizations at local (ANTI FA working with Muslim Brotherhood doing business as MSA and CAIR), national (ACLU and BLM working with CAIR and MPAC) and international levels (OIC working with OSCEand the UN), recognition must given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate at the narrative level as well. In candidate Trump, the opposition saw a threat to the "politically correct" enforcement narratives they've meticulously laid in over the past few decades. In President Trump, they see a latent threat to continue that effort to ruinous effect and their retaliatory response reflects this fear.
INTRODUCTION. Responding to relentless personal assaults on his character, candidate Trump identified the players and the strategy:
"The establishment and their media enablers will control over this nation through means that are very well known. Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed." - President Trump, Oct 2016
Culturally conditioned to limit responses to such attacks as yet another round in the on-going drone from diversity and multicultural malcontents, these broadsides are discounted as political correctness run amuck. However, political correctness is a weapon against reason and critical thinking. This weapon functions as the enforcement mechanism of diversity narratives that seek to implement cultural
Marxism. Candidate Trump's rhetoric in the campaign not only cut through the Marxist narrative, he did so in ways that were viscerally comprehensible to a voting bloc that then made candidate Trump the president; making that bloc self-aware in the process. President Trump is either the candidate he ran as, or he is nothing.
Recognizing in candidate Trump an existential threat to cultural Marxist memes that dominate the prevailing cultural narrative, those that benefit recognize the threat he poses and seek his destruction. For this cabal, Trump must be destroyed. Far from politics as usual, this is a political warfare effort that seeks the destruction of a sitting president. Since Trump took office, the situation has intensified to crisis level proportions. For those engaged in the effort, especially those from within the "deep state" or permanent government apparatus, this raises clear Title 18 (legal) concerns.
The Opposition. While opposition to President Trump manifests itself through political warfare memes centered on cultural Marxist narratives, this hardly means that opposition is limited to Marxists as conventionally understood. Having become the dominant cultural meme, some benefit from it while others are captured by it; including "deep state" actors, globalists, bankers, lslamists, and establishment Republicans. Through the campaign, candidate Trump tapped into a deep vein of concern among many citizens that America is at risk and is slipping away. Globalists and lslamists recognize that for their visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political identity, must be destroyed. Atomization of society must also occur at the individual level; with attacks directed against all levels of group and personal identity. Hence the sexism, racism and xenophobia memes. As a Judea-Christian culture, forced inclusion of post-modern notions of tolerance is designed to induce nihilistic contradictions that reduce all thought, all faith, all loyalties to meaninglessness. Group rights based on sex or ethnicity are a direct assault on the very idea of individual human rights and natural law around which the Constitution was framed. "Transgender acceptance" memes attack at the most basic level by denying a person the right to declare the biological fact of one's sex. When a population has 2 + 2 = 5 imposed on it, there are many that benefit:
• Mainstream Media -The principle mechanism for implementing narratives.
• The Academy - Academia has served as a principle counter-state node for some time and remains a key conduit for creating future adherents to cultural Marxist narratives and their derivative worldview.
• The Deep State - The successful outcome of cultural Marxism is a bureaucratic state beholden to no one, certainly not the American people. With no rule of law considerations outside those that further deep state power, the deep state truly becomes, as Hegel advocated, god bestriding the earth.
• Global Corporatists & Bankers - Exploitation of populations, unfettered by national protections and notions of personal morality and piety.
• Democratic Leadership - The democratic leadership has been a counter-state enabler that executes, sustains, and protects cultural Marxist programs of action and facilitates the relentless expansion of the deep state.
• Republican Leadership - More afraid of being accused of being called a racist, sexist, homophobe or lslamophobe than of failing to enforce their oaths to "support and defend the Constitution," the Republican Establishment accepts and enforces cultural Marxist memes within its own sphere of operations. In doing so, knowingly or not, it becomes an agent of that. These "conservatives" become increasingly indistinguishable from their democratic counterparts save that they misrepresent themselves to their constituents. Lacking the discernment to recognize their situation, they will work with globalists, corporatists, and the international financial interests and will likewise service the deep state. These establishment Republicans are the hard left's designated defeat mechanism in the destruction of the old regime as well as the American ideal. 1 Because candidate Trump publicly exposed them for their duplicitous activities, they are at risk as long as Trump can turn on them and are, therefore, bitter foes. Candidate Trump's success remains an ongoing existential threat to establishment Republicans.
1 For more information on how influence operations of the former Soviet Union targeted leading conservative groups and individuals in order to bring them into line with cultural Marxist narratives. See Link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzZhqeLRIMo
• lslamists - Islamists ally with cultural Marxist because, as far back as the 1980s, they properly assessed that the hard left has a strong chance of reducing Western civilization to its benefit. Having co-opted post-modern narratives as critical points, Islamists deploy these narratives to strategically blind and then control US decision makers. This is by design and purposeful. "By their own hands!" has been the declared strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood since 1991. This strategy seeks to divide American society against itself with the forced imposition of Islamist objectives on one half of American society by the other half. Once a society has been effectively atomized, the population will have lost its faith in the old order, detest those who reduced it, and divide along the lines of narrative adherence. This is the intended outcome of hostile information cum political warfare campaigns and today we see their effects on American society.
Complicating the current situation, many close to the president have pushed him off his message when he was candidate Trump thus alienating him from his base thereby isolating him in the process. When President Trump is not candidate Trump, he becomes dangerously exposed. While the base that elected candidate Trump identified with his vision, they are only Trump's insofar as he holds to the vision that made him president.
Political Warfare Attacks -A Primer. As used here, "political warfare" does not concern activities associated with the American political process but rather exclusively refers to political warfare as understood by the Maoist Insurgency model2. Political warfare is one of the five components of a Maoist insurgency. Maoist methodologies employ synchronized violent and non-violent actions that focus on mobilization of individuals and groups to action. This approach envisions the direct use of non-violent operational arts and tactics as elements of combat power. In Maoist insurgencies, the formation of a counter-state is essential to seizing state power. Functioning as a hostile competing state acting within an existing state, it has an alternate infrastructure. Political warfare operates as one of the activities of the "counter-state" and is primarily focused on the resourcing and mobilization of the counter state or the exhaustion and demobilization of the targeted political movement. Political warfare methods can be implemented at strategic, operational, or tactical levels of operation.
Political warfare is warfare. Strategic information campaigns designed to delegitimize through disinformation arise out of non-violent lines of effort in political warfare regimes. They principally operate through narratives. Because the left is aligned with lslamist organizations at local, national and international levels, recognition should be given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate through coordinated synchronized interactive narratives.
Cultural Marxism - A Primer. While the attacks on President Trump arise out of political warfare considerations based on non-kinetic lines of effort (as discussed below), they operate in a battle-space prepared, informed and conditioned by cultural Marxist drivers. In practical terms, the political warfare assault on President Trump cannot be separated from the cultural Marxist narratives that drive them. From an operational preparation of the environment perspective, President Trump is operating in a battle-space that reflects the left's vision.
2 This discussion relies on Thomas A. Marks' treatment of the Maoist model as discussed in Maoist People's War in Post-Vietnam Asia (Bangkok, Thailand: White Lotus Press, 2007), 1-14. Hereafter "Thomas A. Marks, Maoist People's War."
As used in this discussion, cultural Marxism relates to programs and activities that arise out of Gramsci Marxism, Fabian Socialism and most directly from the Frankfurt School. The Frankfurt strategy deconstructs societies through attacks on culture by imposing a dialectic that forces unresolvable contradictions under the rubric of critical theory. The result is induced nihilism, a belief in everything that is actually the belief in nothing.
That post-modern (diversity/multiculturalism) narratives seeks to implement cultural Marxist objectives can be demonstrated by reference to founding Frankfurt School theorist Herbert Marcuse's repurposing of the term tolerance. In a 1965 ~ Marcuse defined tolerance as intolerance; said it can be implemented through undemocratic means to stop chauvinism (xenophobia), racism, discrimination; and should be extended to the left while denied to the right:
• "The realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed."
• "Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the people (i.e. in the majority of the people). This means that the ways should not be blocked on which a subversive majority could develop, and if they are blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening may require apparently undemocratic means. They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc." (8-9)
• "Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left. As to the scope of this tolerance and intolerance: ... it would extend to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda, of deed as well as of word." (12)
It is through such post-modern constructs that interoperable narratives are established among various left-wing groups as well as between them and Islamist groups at all levels. For example, from the 2001 Conference of Foreign Ministers at Bamako, Mali, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) declared its commitment to fight racism and xenophobia and then declared lslamophobia a "contemporary form of racism":
• In this context, the World Conference urges all states ... take all necessary measures to combat hatred, discrimination, intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance particularly against Islam
• Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance which display an increasing trend, in their most subtle and contemporary forms, constitute a violation of human rights. 3. Contemporary forms of racism are based on discrimination and disparagement on a cultural, rather than biological basis. In this content, the increasing trend of lslamophobia, as a distinct form of xenophobia in non-Muslim societies is very alarming.
That the OIC made these claims as part of its planned inputs to the United Nation's "Third World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance" further demonstrates the coordinated and interoperable nature of these narratives at international levels in international forums.
As cultural Marxist narratives intensify, they are to be further operationalized in the form of hate speech narratives. Hate speech narratives are non-random, coordinated, and fully interoperable escalations of cultural Marxist memes. Key international players include the European Union, the UN, and the OSCE, the OIC and the International Muslim Brotherhood. Hate speech memes are structured, coordinated, and implemented through these same international forums. They involve close coordination with media and social media and include the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) narratives. David Shipler's book Freedom of Speech provides a road map for how hate speech narratives are to be structured, deployed and enforced.
Battlespace. These attack narratives are pervasive, full spectrum and institutionalized at all levels. They operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media, and are entrenched at the upper levels of the bureaucracies and within the foreign policy establishment. They inform the entertainment industry from late night monologues, to situation comedies, to television series memes, to movie themes. The effort required to direct this capacity at President Trump is little more than a programming decision to do so. The cultural Marxist narrative is fully deployed, pervasive, full spectrum and ongoing. Regarding the president, attacks have become a relentless 24/7 effort.
While there is certainly a Marxist agenda and even lslamist motivations that must be seriously addressed in their own right, these motivations alone seem inadequate to explain the scope and magnitude of the effort directed against the president. The economic drivers behind the Marxist and Islamist ideologues are enormously influential and seek to leverage these ideological movements for their own self interests. While beyond the actual scope of this document, the benefactors of these political movements include; Urban Real Estate who depend greatly on immigrant tenants, International Banking who seeks to maintain US debtor status so as to control the application of American power, and elements of the business sector that depend upon immigrant labor or government infrastructure. The overall objective of these economic forces is the forced urbanization of the populace, thereby necessitating a larger, more powerful government. In summary, this is a form of population control by certain business cartels in league with cultural Marxists/corporatists/lslamists who will leverage Islamic terrorism threats to justify the creation of a police state.
Adversary Campaign Plan. Political Warfare has been described as "propaganda in battledress."3 The effort directed at President Trump is executed along one overt, as well as two covert, lines of effort:
• The overt line of effort is PUBLICITY. Publicity is the straightforward projection of a case that builds a picture in the audience's mind designed to garner support. It is facts without context and information the adversary wants the audience to possess that creates an impression and sets conditions. It seeks to establish good will and receptiveness to additional inputs.
• There are two covert lines of effort: PROPOGANDA and INFILTRATION/SUBVERSION.
o Propaganda is the deliberate direction, even manipulation, of information to secure a definite outcome. It is an attempt to direct the thinking of the recipient, without his conscious collaboration, into predetermined channels that are established in the Publicity line of effort. It is the unwitting conditioning of the recipient by devious methods with an ulterior motive that seeks to move them incrementally over time into greater belief and acceptance of message transmitted in the Publicity line of effort.
o Infiltration and subversion operate internal to the targeted organization in order to inform, target, coordinate, and amplify the effects of the publicity and propaganda. Both operate to gather intelligence, obstruct legitimate courses of action, provide inside information, and leak sensitive information that undermines the leadership and suppresses the morale of friendly elements.
3 "Political Warfare Executive - The Meaning, Techniques and Methods of Political Warfare," His Britannic Majesty's Government, London, 1942, 5.
o Infiltration of political and social groups within a target state is done for the purpose of extending counterstate influence and control. The endgame is concealed and may involve illicit activities.
o Subversion undermines or detaches the loyalties of significant political and social groups within the target state and transfers political and/or ideological loyalties to the counter-state. As the counter-state forms, a counter-elite of influential individual and key leaders within the target state will later facilitate the legitimacy and permanency of the new regime.
Political warfare employs both publicity and propaganda. It recognizes no intrinsic virtue in the news but rather envisions it as a mechanism to exploit and build up support. From a political warfare perspective, control of the news cycle is the most potent means of attracting and building up a favorable audience. As it relates to the news cycle, publicity and propaganda can be merged to form a "pseudo-publicity" that is presented as news in furtherance of sustaining pseudo-realities maintained by cultural Marxist memes. Pseudo-publicity treatment of President Trump dominates the news cycle. The current campaign against President Trump operates in the following manner:
The Meta Narrative. Meta narratives seeks to delegitimize President Trump, his administration, and the vision of America he projected as a candidate. With cultural Marxist memes serving as the backdrop, President Trump is to be relentlessly characterized as unfit through the use of supporting narratives acting to move unwitting populations to belief in the meta narrative. Hence:
•"President Trump is illegitimate"
•"President Trump is corrupt"
•"President Trump is dishonest"
Note that the twitter accounts and mainstream media personalities pushing this narrative have seen their audience numbers rise greatly in the past 6 months. This is a direct result of the supporting and backdrop narratives channeling individuals to this meta-narrative.
Supporting Narratives. Meta-narratives are supported by an ongoing series supporting-narratives that can be swapped out as circumstances warrant. It is important to recognize that these stories do not have to be true, valid or accurate to serve their purpose. Over time, deserved or not, the cumulative effect of these supporting narratives will result in a Trump fatigue. From a political warfare perspective, President Trump's inability to meet this challenge will cast him as a weak failed leader. The current list of supporting narratives include:
• "Russia hacked the election" - illegitimate
• "Obstruction of Justice" - corrupt
• "Hiding Collusion" - dishonest
• "Putin Puppet" - treasonous
Backdrop Narratives. The backdrop to the meta and supporting narratives are cultural Marxist memes designed to sustain a general sense of loathing of President Trump and the America that elected him.
• "[meta] President Trump is illegitimate, [supporting] he was elected because of Russian hacking, [backdrop] and besides, he a racist, sexist xenophobe."
Adversaries utilize these interlocking narratives as a defensive political and information warfare screen that silences critics and smears supporters of President Trump. When people in the media question the behavior, actions and decisions of the Trump Administration's opponents, they are immediately said to be "working for the Russians" or "supporting Russian propaganda." Individual Americans who support the President are deemed "deplorable" and "racist."
End State. Attacks on President Trump are not just about destroying him, but also about destroying the vision of America that lead to his election. Those individuals and groups seeking the destruction of President Trump actually seek to suffocate the vision of America that made him president. Hence, the end state is not just a delegitimized, destabilized, immobilized and possibly destroyed presidency; but also a demoralized movement composed of a large enough bloc to elect a president that subsequently become self-aware of its own disenfranchisement.
The recent turn of events give rise to the observation that the defense of President Trump is the defense of America. In the same way President Lincoln was surrounded by political opposition both inside and outside of his wire, in both overt and covert forms, so too is President Trump. Had Lincoln failed, so too would have the Republic. The administration has been maneuvered into a constant backpedal by relentless political warfare attacks structured to force him to assume a reactive posture that assures inadequate responses. The president can either drive or be driven by events; it's time for him to drive them.