The January 6, 2021 "Insurrection" Needs an Independent Investigation

The January 6, 2021 "insurrection" has not been thoroughly investigated by the FBI or the media.

The January 6, 2021 disturbance at the Capitol was a godsend to the radical left and its supporters. Media claims that BLM and Antifa riots were “mostly peaceful” and politicians claiming these groups are not organized have proven ineffective.  After approximately 2 billion dollars worth of property damage and over two dozen deaths the Deep State is now able to point to this incident and draw attention away from the BLM and Antifa riots.  Is it possible that the radical left realized this potential benefit and decided to infiltrate the protest to insure it was more violent?  FBI Chief Chris Wray claimed there was no evidence Antifa members played a role during the January 6th US Capitol protests

In spite of what FBI Chief Wray says there was at least one radical leftist posturing as a Trump supporter at the Capitol.   John Sullivan fancies himself a leader of numerous leftists.  He was accompanied by a female, Jade Sacker, a documentary photographer from a Native American family culturally displaced from their land.  It is unlikely that she is a Trump supporter.  Sullivan's brother, James Sullivan, claims there were 226 members of Antifa involved in the attack on the Capitol on January 6.  One of John Sullivan's correspondents, deaththreat, claimed, "I was in front line of the battle and know who was there (sic) personally.  It was a large sum of anti-thumpers." The FBI claims Antifa was not involved.  They have performed a thorough investigation and therefore anyone believing otherwise is a conspiracy theorist or mentally imbalanced.  However, the FBI might have a reason to conceal the radical participation.

The FBI routinely infiltrates radical groups.  Jeremy Brown attended the Stop the Steal protests in Washington DC on January 6.  He has videotaped FBI efforts to recruit him to spy on patriot groups.  He did not release these tapes until he became angered by the lies surrounding the event: “After listening to politicians and the FBI Director, Chris Wray, tell lie after bald-faced lie to the American People, he could not stay silent any longer.”  John Sullivan's radical actions are played down by the media.  Politifact claims there’s no evidence that Sullivan "incited (the) insurgence" on his own.  Jade Sacker claimed, "He was vocal, but I wouldn’t say he was inciting violence."  Sullivan is on tape saying, “If we don’t get in, we’re going to burn this shit down” among other obscene and volatile remarks.

Could the FBI be involved in activities that it would not want the American public to know about?  According to Judge Andrew Napolitano, in the past 10 years, there’ve been 20 Terrorist plots against the US. Three of those plots were real the other 17 were created–and then stopped–by the FBI.  Perhaps the judge in under a lot of stress and needs his meds increased.  But wait.  Here we have the newspaper of record, a paper that only prints what is fit to print, saying essentially the same thing.  The New York Times  reported details on several of these plots.  The article claims, "all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists."  Informers are recruited because of a vulnerability, they "are often convicted felons working in exchange for leniency."  Judge Colleen McMahon commented on one pathetic case: “Only the government could have made a ‘terrorist’ out of Mr. Cromitie, whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope.” 

The secrecy surrounding the events of January 6 has raised more interest in the government's actions.  The murder of Ashli Babbitt is one example.  This 5'2" woman was shot at close range by a plainclothesman while she attempted to climb through a window.  There is not a use of force policy in the civilized world that would permit an officer discharging his weapon in such a situation.  An authority on such matters, Chris Cuomo, asserted, “Police are trained to deal with non-compliance, with force that is not lethal.”  Perhaps the officer mistook his Glock for a taser.  Yet Rep. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla. stated, "When they broke the glass in the back, the [police] lieutenant that was there . . . didn't have a choice at that time."  Perhaps the requirements for the Capitol police need to be raised.  Since 2015 there have been three incidents where Capitol police left their service weapons in restrooms.