Book Review - Yeager: An Autobiography

General Yeager is in a class of individuals that includes historical figures like Horatius and Leonidas. Fewer and fewer men are entering that class. There are still men like Chesley Sullenberger but more men like Francesco Schettino, the Captain of the Costa Concordia, are being produced. Yeager showed courage and character in everyday life as well as in combat. The item that interested me the most about this book was his admission that he was a war criminal. This is an example of his courage and character and I am certain his editor suggested that he remove the information. Yeager writes, “We were ordered to commit an atrocity. I’m certainly not proud of that particular strafing mission against civilians. But it is there, on the record and in my memory." “If it occurred to anyone to refuse to participate (nobody refused, as I recall) that person would have probably been court-martialed. I remember sitting next to (Major Donald H. Bochkay) Bochkay at the briefing and whispering to him: ‘If we’re gonna do things like this, we sure as hell better make sure we’re on the winning side.’” Respected historian have done their best to ignore items like this. It does not conform to the crusader narrative.

Additions to the MP Third Edition – “Nuremberg was colonial.”

            Morgenthau’s policies led to the creation of a third world colony in the center of Europe.  Francis Biddle described the atmosphere in Germany during his attendance at the Nuremberg Trails:

Nuremberg was colonial, we had taken the country after this wretched war, and were living in it, had to be there for a while.  We weren't sure how the natives would act, whether they would lie down and lick our boots, or slit our throats on too dark a night, yet we were determined to dine out on occasion and have as much fun as we could.  It was like Kipling's Simla, pointed to a different setting in a very different time.  

This was an exciting time, especially for Great White Hunters.  Ernest Hemingway apparently was quite proud of the trophies he accumulated during his stay in Germany.  In a letter to Charles Scribner Hemingway tells of a young German officer who refused to answer his questions.   The officer informed Hemingway it was a violation of the Geneva Convention to shoot prisoners.  Hemingway wrote: “What a mistake you made. Brother, I told him and shot him three times in the belly fast and then, when he went down on his knees, shot him on the topside so his brains came out of his mouth.”  In a letter to Arthur Mizener on 2 June 1950, Hemingway described killing his last “kraut”, an unarmed youngster on a bicycle, “. . . I said ‘let me take him’ and I shot him with an M1  . . . he was a boy about the age of my son Patrick . . . I had shot him through the spine and the bullet had come out  through the liver.”    

         Many of these victims remained nameless.  However, there were also well known victims.  The German conductor Leo Borchard was killed by a US sentries in Berlin.  And the Austrian composer and conductor Anton von Webern was killed in Salzburg by an American sentry.        

---

Dumbledore’s Army - Things Fall Apart; The Centre Cannot Hold

When Mick Mulvaney was selected to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) he complemented the staff for being very professional.  There are a significant number of CFPB employees who are opposed to the president and any of his appointees.  They have formed a resistance group they call Dumbledore’s Army.  Although members of other departments, agencies and bureaus do not call themselves Dumbledore’s Army they are essentially of the same mindset.  Perhaps the largest number of these Dumbledores are in the Department of Justice and the intelligence community.  They are mounting an attack on the Trump administration and are suffering one defeat after another.  Things are falling apart.

The major attack is being carried out by Robert Mueller, the Independent Counsel.  Several of the attorneys on Mueller’s team have collectively given over $62,000 in political contributions to Democrats.  These are the contributions that we know of.  Three of his attorneys have reportedly been removed for anti-Trump bias.  But as Rep. Jim Jordan said, "If you get kicked off the Mueller team for being anti-Trump, there wouldn't be anybody left on the Mueller team. There has to be more.”  This says a lot about the independence of the Independent Counsel.

The most significant removal was that of Peter Strzok and his paramour Lisa Page.  Strzok was Mueller’s second in command.  He was one of the officials who interviewed Hillary Clinton.  He helped lead the investigation into Clinton’s private server clearing her.  He reviewed 50,000 Hillary Clinton State Department emails on Anthony Weiner’s computer and cleared the Weiner-Huma Abedin emails in record time just days before the 2016 election.  Again he found nothing incriminating.  He was the lead FBI investigator in Comey’s Trump Russia investigation.  He played a key role in agreeing to pay Christopher Steele $50,000 to find evidence to support the dossier’s claims.  Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) believes it may have been Strzok who brought the infamous Trump dossier to a FISA court to obtain clearance for surveillance on members of the Trump campaign.  Strzok edited the FBI’s judgment of Mrs. Clinton’s handling of her emails to “extremely careless” from “grossly negligent” as it was described in a previous draft.  He also oversaw the bureau’s interviews with ousted National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Lisa Page, an FBI attorney, was also removed from Mueller’s team.  Her correspondence with Strzok contained such suggestions as “Trump should go f himself.”  On Oct. 20, 2016, Strzok called Trump a “f*cking idiot.”  More than 10,000 texts between Strzok and Page were reviewed by the Justice Department.  375 of them were released on 12 December.  The existence of the texts was not disclosed until nearly four months after Strzok was removed.  The emails are extremely damaging.  One of Strzok’s emails reads, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office.”  Andy is most likely Andrew McCabe.  In which case it appears that they were plotting against President Trump with the Deputy FBI Director.  Every federal employee knows that emails are subject to monitoring.  This is an example of extremely poor judgment.  Perhaps they believed that if they were monitored the monitor would have similar views and would not reveal their content.  They were obviously wrong.  They should know that there are moles even within Dumbledore’s Army willing to leak information damaging to the resistance’s cause.   Andrew McCabe postponed an appearance before the House Intelligence Committee that was scheduled for 12th.  The Justice Department claimed the cancellation was due to a “routine scheduling error.”

The next significant removal is that of former Assoc. Deputy Attorney General Bruce G Ohr.  Ohr had several meetings with Christopher Steele, the author of the “dossier,” and Glenn Simpson, the founder of Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm.  His wife Nellie H. Ohr worked for Fusion GPS and may have worked on the “dossier.”  Ohr reportedly did not reveal his October 2016 contacts with Steele or Simpson to DOJ leadership.  We are supposed to believe that Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General, knew nothing about the activities of Strzok and Ohr.  If this is the case Rosenstein has no business supervising people in the intelligence business.

Much of the information we have about this situation is the result of leaks.  Leaks have plagued the DOJ for well over a year.  Many of these leaks are clearly felonies.  The former head of the FBI admitted in public that he was the source of a leak.  Has anyone in the leadership been prosecuted for leaking to the press?  The answer to this question is no.  No one in the intelligence community can claim that they are unable to identify the leakers.  These leaks can be traced.  At the same time the leadership of the intelligence community is denying information requested by Congress.  Representative Nunes has instructed his staff to draft contempt-of-Congress citations against Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray.  Wray, appointed by President Trump, appears to have joined Dumbledore’s Army.   His response to a question about the Clinton email scandal he responded: “I think of the Inspector General’s investigation as de novo in one sense, in which that it’s objective, arms length, no skin in the game, if you will. But you’re right, the Inspector General is not second guessing prosecutorial decisions and things like that. However, the Inspector General is looking at the very important question of whether or not improper political considerations factored into the decision making. If he were to conclude that’s what happened, then I think at that point were we’re in a situation were we have to assess what else might need to be done to unring that bell.”  Either this is an example of intentional obfuscation or Mr. Wray is an extremely confused individual.  

The Deep State vs. Trump

Retired CIA station chief Scott Uehlinger claims there is a “Deep State.”  He argued, “The Deep State is made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.”  Uehlinger is correct except for the fact that he exaggerates the role Obama has played in its creation.  The “Deep State” had its greatest growth during the Roosevelt Administration when bureaucrats like Soviet asset Harry Dexter White recruited large numbers of Communists and progressives to man the government.  Most of the Communists were eventually weeded out of government but the progressives for the most part remained.  These progressives gradually gained control of most of the federal bureaucracy.  Under President Obama even many of the conservative holdouts were driven from the government.

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke claims nearly one-third of the employees at his department are not loyal to him and President Trump.  He claimed, “I got 30 percent of the crew that’s not loyal to the flag.”  Either the Department of Interior is a radical exception or Zinke is being extremely optimistic.  There is a large number of professionals in the Department of the Interior who will carry out orders regardless of the administration directing them.  There are even some extremely patriotic employees.  However, particularly in the leadership, there is a significant number of progressives who will actively sabotage efforts by a conservative administration to curtail government interference in the lives of its citizens.  What percentage of the upper echelons of the federal bureaucracy voted for Donald Trump?  That number is exceedingly small.

One of the most crucial fields that a president must rely upon is intelligence.  The NSA, FBI and CIA are in many respects the eyes and ears of a president.  These agencies are also the most compromised.  The heads of each of these agencies have intentionally misled the public and even lied before Congress.  CIA director John Brennan lied when he claimed, “Let me assure you the CIA was in no way spying on [the committee] or the Senate.”  He was later forced to apologize for his statement.  Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Congress that the NSA was not collecting information on millions of Americans.  Documents leaked by Edward Snowden revealed that he had lied.  FBI Director James Comey lied to Congress about his decision not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.

The departments that oversee these agencies are also compromised.  This was illustrated by the recent release of Department of Justice documents by Judicial Watch.  These documents showed strong support by top DOJ officials for former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates’ refusal to enforce President Trump’s Middle East travel ban executive order.  Andrew Weissmann, one of Robert Mueller’s top prosecutors applauded Yates emailing: “I am so proud. And in awe. Thank you so much. All my deepest respects.”  Yates was subsequently fired for disobeying a direct order from the President.  The documents contain numerous emails sent from official Justice Department email addresses.   One was from DOJ Civil Division Appellate Attorney Jeffrey Clair who wrote, “Thank you AG Yates. I’ve been in civil/appellate for 30 years and have never seen an administration with such contempt for democratic values and the rule of law. The President’s order is an unconstitutional embarrassment and I applaud you for taking a principled stand against defending it.”  Of course Clair wrote this before the Supreme Court ruled that the travel ban was constitutional. 

Pandora's Box Revisited

The names of sexual predators are flying out of Pandora’s Box at an increasing rate.  There is panic in the media and the halls of Congress.  Deals are being frantically made to stop the bleeding.  The efforts to defeat Roy Moore’s campaign for the Senate from Alabama have resulted in a historic social transformation.  Even with access to Obama’s database and NSA records, the best the deep state can come up with is 38 year old allegations of sexual abuse by Moore.  Moore’s alleged crimes are trivial compared to what prominent politicians and media personalities are being accused of.

People who were outraged at allegation about Moore’s behavior 38 years ago now appear to be defending more recent behavior that is often backed up with photos and documents. 

The scandals have exposed the Congress’s methods to conceal embarrassing incidents.  The Congress Office of Compliance (COC) was set up to deal with complaints.  It reportedly disbursed $17 million over a twenty year period to cover complaints.  The admission about the COC is a distraction of sorts and the 17 million figure is a gross underestimate.  In addition to the COC there is the House Employment Counsel advising members how to conceal their behavior.  These are two institutions that have been reported on in the press.  Are there any more?   

Much has been made of the $17 million payout.  However, neither one of the two prominent politicians who have been exposed paid their victims out of this fund.  Rep. John Conyers paid a former employee $27,111.74 out of his Member’s Representational Allowance account.  Rep. Raul Grijalva gave $48,395 to the female employee who left her job after three months.  Grijalva’s settlement was reportedly arranged by lawyers at the House Employment Counsel.  Is spite of politicians receiving advice from lawyers, these arrangements may be illegal.   Also the COC may be dealing with only a fraction of the complaints.  Tracy Manzer, Congresswoman Speier’s spokesperson told CNN that 80 percent of people who have come to her office to share stories of sexual misconduct never told the COC.

In order to protect themselves from charges of complicity, people in a position of power must claim that the charges against an individual came as a complete surprise.  Matt Lauer’s co-host Savannah Guthrie fought back tears when she announced Lauer had been fired for “inappropriate sexual behavior.  She stated, “we do not know more than what I just shared with you.”  NBC News Chairman Andrew Lack told staff it "may not have been an isolated incident."  If Savannah knew nothing about Lauer’s behavior she has no business in the news business.  If Andrew Lack thinks Lauer’s behavior “may” not have been isolated he has no business being in management.  In 2012 Lauer's former co-host Katie Couric said he pinched her "on the a-- a lot."  Joe Scarborough claimed he attended a Friars Club event for a roast of Lauer.  He claims many of the jokes were made about his sexual pursuits at work.  He added, "So was this whispered behind closed doors? No, it was shouted from the mountaintops and everybody laughed about it,"

This type of behavior is virtually impossible to keep secret.  Politicians have the advantage of paying their victims with other people’s money.  Cokie Roberts, NPR correspondent and ABC News commentator, claimed "every female in the press corps knew" to avoid being in an elevator with Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), and has apparently known about this "for years."  She added, “you know they are so used to it. I mean, the culture of Capitol Hill for so many decades was men being bad.”  Conyers’ attorney Arnold E. Reed, claims there are allegations against "many members" of the House and Senate. He might be suggesting that Conyers does not intend to go down alone.  The Congress of the United States is like a small fraternity.  Members are fully aware of what other members are up to.  Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer know who has stepped over the line.  They knew about Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy.  Kennedy made no effort to conceal his affairs “including public sex in 1985 and 1987 at La Brasserie restaurant.  Yet his colleagues referred to him as “the gentleman from Massachusetts.”

There is an obvious double standard when it comes to aberrant behavior by progressives.  If Judge Moore had drugged and had intercourse with a 13 year old girl that would be a crime.  When Roman Polanski did it Whoopi Goldberg claimed it was not “rape-rape.”  The excuses used to defend Bill Clinton’s behavior are too numerous to recount.  The media does its best not to cover incidents that would embarrassment colleagues or politicians unless they disagree with them.  The attack on Judge Moore appears to have failed.  In fact it has exploded in the face of the left.    They are most likely working on a new revelation that will be announced on December 11, one day before the election.  This will not give Moore’s defenders time to refute it.