Social media companies have not been completely successful in censoring information that is unfavorable to the Deep State. Government may have to step in.
Conservative frequently complain about Twitter and Facebook policies that censor conservative views. Even “moderates” admit that these social networking services are biased against conservatives. The Wrap reports, “Twitter and Facebook have been increasingly proactive in moderating content.” Moderating content is a euphemism for censoring. Twitter and Facebook are social networking services that are privately owned. It is argued that they are entitled to deny service to anyone they choose. (Could they deny service on the basis of race?) Their influence on public opinion cannot be overstated, however. In addition to social networking services, website and blog hosting services are capable of denying service. Recently WordPress, the world’s largest website and blog hosting service informed the site, The Conservative Treehouse, that it was being deplatformed. The reason given was "the incompatibility between your site’s content and our terms." Social media have censored a large amount of information. However, they have not been 100% effective. They will be making improvements.
Of course Americans are protected by the Second Amendment. Government censorship can not happen here. We are a nation of laws, not men. We have free and fair elections. (Please excuse the sarcasm.) However, if the private media companies are not able to filter out unapproved opinion the government may be forced to step in. Terrorist and racist posts must be blocked. This must be done for the greater good; to protect the American public. Fortunately Facebook has been able to team up with people like ex-Stasi agent Anetta Kahane, founder of the Amadeu Antonio Foundation. Still, if this fails the government must step in. The system is already in place and only needs to be imported.
Government censorship is obviously nothing new. It has been countered in various ways. One effective way is the production of Samizdats (Russian for self-publishing). Samizdats were a form of resistance where individuals reproduced censored publications, often by hand, and passed the documents from reader to reader. The Soviets saw this as a serious threat and harsh punishment was meted out to people caught possessing or copying Samizdats.
No comments:
Post a Comment