Politico
provides an account of a State Department election night “party” in Kabul’s
U.S. embassy. The author, May
Jeong, explains “State Department employees, who are officially barred from
political activism while living abroad but tend to support Democrats.” As proof he reports, “On the wall hung
a Donald Trump piñata.” He reports
a change in the party’s atti The article
explains the role of Scott Guggenheim, “senior adviser” to Afghan President
Ashraf Ghani. He describes
Guggenheim as, “one of the most powerful people in the country.” Guggenheim has worked with Ghani since
2002. Ghani and Guggenheim are
member of the same elite. Ghani is
described as “former academic whose lifelong passion has been studying how to
fix broken countries.” Guggenheim
spent the first half of his career as an international development expert. They attended some of the same schools
and both worked for the World Bank.
tude when it became clear that Trump was going to
win the election.
Jeong claims that Guggenheim’s “sympathies run far closer to
Afghanistan than the United States” and that he “often slips into the
collective possessive pronoun—our country, our people—and refers just as
reflexively to ‘you Americans.’”
He sees Afghanistan as a victim of modernizing struggles. Apparently he believes in the “Noble
Savage Theory.” He attributes Afghanistan’s
trouble to the result of British colonialism. “What the British achieved was turning one of the oldest
civilizations into warring tribes.”
The problem with this theory is that most of Afghanistan’s problems preceeded
the British invasion. The United
Nations Development Program rates Afghanistan one of the worst countries in
the world to be born female. The sexual
abuse of children is long standing characteristic of Afghan culture. “The
practice is called bacha bazi, literally ‘boy play,’ and American soldiers and
Marines have been instructed not to intervene.”
One of Guggenheim’s major duties is to act as Afghanistan’s
informal ambassador to the world of foreign donors who fund most of the
country’s budget. Approximately 70
percent of the Afghan government’s budget since the 2001 has been supplied by
foreign donors. Guggenheim asked, “Is the Parliament of Afghanistan really
representative of the country, or is it a bunch of warlords dividing up
national rent? This is what American foreign policy in Afghanistan has created.
The institutions they built up are deeply corrupt.” There are billions of taxpayer dollars circulating through
Afghanistan. One example is the
$43 million ($42.7 million, to be exact) spent to build a compressed natural
gas station in Afghanistan. Naturally this figure was disputed when the cost
became public. Critics claim the
true cost was somewhere between $5 million and $10 million. This is not a very precise figure for a
facility that would cost no more than $500,000 in neighboring Pakistan.
Guggenheim views Afghanistan as an American experiment. He was attracted to the job there by
“the promise of the early years.”
He saw Afghanistan as a “modern society that would catch up to regional
success stories like India or Iran.”
After emerging from decades of civil war and misrule it offered a
country-sized laboratory. Afghanistan
was a chance to implement some of the theories Guggenheim and Ghani had “discussed
during countless conversations at weddings, backyard swims and garden parties
across decades.” Progressives
believed that a vote for Ghani was “a vote for progress, for reform, for
equality, for human rights, and a sense of Afghanistan joining the rest of the
world.” Guggenheim described his
vision: “What I’d like to see is countries with deep historical legacies, that
are struggling, pull it off. Some
sense that they will finally get their act together and they are going to be
democratic and there is going to be basic freedoms. Kids can go to a movie
theater and not worry about being blown up, that sort of thing. I’m still a
deep idealist on those scores.”
This would have been a prefect time for Mr. Guggenheim to break out in
song: “You may say I’m a dreamer But I’m not the only one. I hope some day you’ll join us And the
world will live as one.” But how
many eggs will be required to make this omelet?
The people implementing U.S. policy in Afghanistan will have
to put away their piñata and deal with the Afghan people for what they
are. They will not be holding any
“gay” pride parades in Kabul in the near future. The United States is providing billions to support an
admittedly corrupt government yet this government is giving away mining rights
to Chinese companies. Guggenheim
appears to be coming to the realization that the theories formulated at
“weddings, backyard swims and garden parties across decades” may not be
practical. He declared, “What you
are doing is doomed. But isn’t
that the story of life? And so, you do it anyway.” Jeong described this as “sardonic wit.” It is a type of wit that goes over well
at garden parties but not in foxholes.
He should not try out his wit on the mothers of soldiers who have returned
to the U.S. in body bags. The
elite has a different sense of humor.
No comments:
Post a Comment