The recent controversy surrounding the events in
Charlottesville illustrate a problem the media is having with President
Trump. Supporters of the President
will remain with him under almost any circumstance. His opponents will oppose him regardless of what he says. If
he says “good morning” they will manage to find some nefarious motive in his
statement. There are a large
number of people in the middle who can be swayed either way. If they get their information exclusively
from the establishment media they will tend to be critical of the
President. The establishment media
is almost universally opposed to Trump.
The problem for the media is that an increasing number of people are
getting their information from the internet. The internet contains a wide
spectrum of information. Much of
it is nonsense. However, it also
contains 100% accurate information.
If people want to know what the President said during his press
conference they can read the transcript. Fair minded people can determine for themselves if the
President’s remarks have been distorted.
Much of the criticism of the President revolved
around his condemnation of both sides in the violence in Charlottesville. Trump was asked, “Is the alt-left as
bad as white supremacy?” He
responded, “you had a group on one side that was bad, and you had a group on
the other side that was also very violent.” He continued, “you had a group on the other side that came
charging in, without a permit, and they were very, very violent.” This position is inexcusable. The progressive narrative is that the
Antifa are against hate and are therefore the good guys. This narrative has been accepted by
Trump’s Republican opponents. John
McCain claimed, “There’s no moral equivalency between racists & Americans
standing up to defy hate&bigotry.
The President of the United States should say so.” Mitt Romney tweeted, “No, not the
same. One side is racist, bigoted,
Nazi. The other opposes racism and
bigotry. Morally different
universes.” Lindsey Graham
stated, “Through his statements
yesterday, President Trump took a step backward by again suggesting there is
moral equivalency between the white supremacist neo-Nazis and KKK members who
attended the Charlottesville rally and people like [Heather] Heyer.”
Are the organizations attacking the alt-right
respectable groups worthy of support by Republican senators? Protesters frequently wear masks to
conceal their identity. They often
use symbols of Che Guevara and Mao Zedong as fashion statements. They
frequently carry flags from an ideology responsible for the deaths of perhaps 100
million people. They routinely
riot at G20 summits, causing extensive property damage. Perhaps the two groups are not morally
equivalent. It may be that the
“Antifa” are more destructive than the alt-right groups.
Donald Trump has repeatedly condemned the alt-right
groups during his press conferences: “I’ve condemned neo-Nazis. Neo-Nazis and
the white nationalists . . . should be condemned totally. It looked like they had some rough, bad
people -- neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.” The President mentioned those who
attended the protest who were not extremists but attended because they opposed
the removal of historic monuments.
He remarked, “you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and
white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely
unfairly.” Is this sentence
unclear? He states, “other than
neo-Nazis and white nationalists.”
Yet a reporter immediately asks, “Sir, I just didn’t understand what you
were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly?
I just don’t understand what you were saying.” This question is an indication of a lack of understanding on
the part of the press. Even more incomprehensible
was Lindsey Graham’s comment that the President equated the neo-Nazis with
Heather Heyer, the woman who was killed during the protest. Trump specifically said, “I hear she
was a fine -- really, actually, an incredible young woman.”
The other inexcusable statement by the President
was his claim that “You’re changing history. You’re changing culture.” He said, “So this week it's Robert E.
Lee. I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down. I wonder, is it George
Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you
really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?” When it was pointed out that, “George Washington and Robert
E. Lee are not the same,” he responded that they were both slave owners. The reporter’s claim that Lee and
Washington were not the same implied that after Lee the protests would
end. However there have been news
reports that there are calls for the removal of both Washington and Jefferson
monuments.
If all the demands of the Antifa were granted
and every last vestige of the Confederacy was remove, would they all return to
their homes and resume their peaceful lives? Everyone knows they would create a new list of demands. Confederate monuments are just a tool
they are using to assert their power.
Republican politicians are using them to attack the President. They are either extremely cynical or
incredibly ignorant. Conservatives
need to emphasize the moral depravity of Antifa and questions those
politicians’ motives.
No comments:
Post a Comment