John Koster's Operation Snow is the
most comprehensive account in the English language of Harry Dexter White role
in provoking war with Japan. This period of history is still an emotionally
charged subject as several of the reviews demonstrate. There is still lingering
hostility towards Japan and this is supplemented by the need of progressives to
maintain many of the myths that surround the period. Were the Japanese
ruthless? Certainly. Koster is accused of "glossing over" Japanese
atrocities which Christopher Best found "disgraceful." The Chinese
have condemned the Japanese for not dealing with the subject of the Rape of
Nanking in their textbooks. Do the Chinese deal with the tens of millions of
deaths under Mao in their textbooks? Chris might check out The Morgenthau Plan:
Soviet Influence on American Postwar Planning for atrocities that have been
"glossed over." Chinese workers were migrating to Manchuria while it
was under Japanese rule.
Koster's critics are very revealing.
A book review that begins with, "I have not read Koester's (sic)
book," is bound to be informative. Another critic states, "this book
did not hold my attention long." This individual is an authority because
he once sat on Stalin's toilet seat. Other criticisms include, the book
"truly demonstrates the paranoid nature of some in these times."
"The Reds under every bed conspiracy theory still has legs." And
"only conspiracy theorists and the very gullible would believe." In
other words if you believe Koster's theory you are either stupid or crazy. Name
calling is not a convincing argument.
One criticism of the book involves
the subtitle. It states that White "triggered" Pearl Harbor. This led
Kenneth Goff to ask, "Could an assistant treasury secretary have
precipitated the attack on Pearl Harbor?" Steve Daugherty "was
unconvinced . . . that HDW was almost exclusively responsible for the US-Japan
war." I did not draw that conclusion from the book. Koster deals with
Stanley Hornbeck in the State Department who was part of the pro-Chinese group
and certainly Lauchin Currie and Harry Hopkins, White House advisors, supported
White pro-Soviet position. White played a key role in composing the
"ultimatum" sent to the Japanese as well as in the oil embargo that
preceded it.
White still has his defenders. He was
a "victim of prejudice and bias," who "got seduced by falsified
claims of Soviet economic gains." It has been pointed out that White
helped the Soviets because he "wanted to help whoever was fighting Hitler."
This is an excellent argument except for the fact that White met with Pavlov in
May 1941 while the Soviets and Nazi were still allies. White is frequently
referred to as a humanitarian. Dietz Ziechmann claims White, "felt the
need for . . . government action against poverty and human suffering."
HDW was not merely a Communist. He
was a Stalinist. He conscientiously worked for the second greatest mass
murderer of all times. He also played a role in bringing the greatest mass
murdered in history to power in China.
It has been pointed out that White had an incredible
impact on history. Yet he is virtually unknown even to many members of the
International Monetary Fund and the World Bank; two organizations he was
instrumental in founding. There is indeed "a great deal more to this story."
White played a major role in eliminating the two world powers containing the
Soviet Union. His story is yet to be told. Koster's book and The Morgenthau
Plan are a good start.
The author provides absolutely no documentation to support his idea that a mole provoked the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor. The author goes on to tell us that the Japanese did not want to go to war with the USA and that the people we know as Japanese war criminals were actually misunderstood family men who wanted to hurt nobody. It is a big load of crap.
ReplyDeleteDear Unknown, If you want documentation about White's role in instigating war with Japan you can read my book. I don't think John Koster believes that White single handedly provoked the attack. He could not have done so if people in the administration really didn't want was. As for Japanese war criminals; Japan should apologize for the Rape of Nanking when the Chinese apologize for killing tens of millions under Mao.
DeleteThe author provides absolutely no documentation to support his idea that a mole provoked the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor. The author goes on to tell us that the Japanese did not want to go to war with the USA and that the people we know as Japanese war criminals were actually misunderstood family men who wanted to hurt nobody. It is a big load of crap.
ReplyDelete