Steven Ambrose’s credentials as a historian have
recently come under scrutiny.
Timothy D. Rives,
the deputy director of the Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum, claims,
“the records I found did not substantiate Ambrose’s account of how he met
President Eisenhower, nor did the records support his claims to have
interviewed Eisenhower extensively over four or five years.” Rives claimed “Ike’s post-presidential
records . . . differs radically from the one described by Ambrose.” Rives wrote this after a 2010 article
by Richard
Rayner in the New Yorker in which Rayner claimed Rives discovered that,
“contrary to Ambrose’s claims, Eisenhower never approached him to write his
biography.” If Ambrose fabricated the detains of his relatioinship with Eisenhower, what else did he fabricate.
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Thursday, February 23, 2017
Chris Cuomo to the Rescue.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/794df/794df4c9da9109456f8770f6622f59477aee6a39" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6438/b6438e71700936c1ad745bef3bed2158ba7891b3" alt=""
Prominent Jesuit priest Father James Martin, editor-at-large of America magazine, also spoke out on the subject of transgender bathrooms. Martin said the Church should embrace homosexuality's "special gifts."
"It doesn't hurt anybody" for boys to be allowed in girls bathrooms and vice versa, Martin tweeted. "It's an affront to their dignity as human beings" to deny men access to women's restrooms and vice versa.
![]() |
Chris, "Be more tolerant." While we are in such a tolerant nonjudgmental mood how about saying a few nice words about the gentleman below. |
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Nebbish Proves The Dunning–Kruger Effect
![]() |
De plane, de plane! |
Berkeley professor and former U.S. Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, has claimed that President Donald Trump incited Monday’s riots in Sweden. He also suggested that the riot in Berkeley that prevented a Breitbart editor from speaking at the University was organized by right-wingers. His claim was mentioned in Salon, Newsweek and the UC Berkeley’s official blog. Eventually the absurdity of the claim inspired the Washington Post to label it “phantasmagorical.” Perhaps Bob has spent too much time in Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy Accumulator.
Monday, February 20, 2017
Dr Franken Diagnoses The President
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0427d/0427dbec4bb8b9076b984b3ebfecfeb3bab8ba28" alt=""
Saturday, February 18, 2017
The Media vs. Trump
Credibility is a person’s most valuable asset. For someone in the media credibility is
essential. People make mistakes
and the occasional mistake can be forgiven. However, when an individual or organization continuously
makes “mistakes” favoring one side of an argument their bias becomes obvious.
There are people on the left and people on the right of the
political spectrum. The vast
majority of people are somewhere in the middle. The left and right need to appeal to this group in order to
attain power. In this battle to
capture the middle the left has a powerful advantage. The left controls the commanding heights of our society:
academia, the bureaucracy (7.2% of Washington DC voters voted for Trump), the entertainment
industry, and most importantly, the media. The left also has a powerful disadvantage. Their fringe includes demonstrator often
carrying foreign flags, rioters destroying property, protesters wearing
genitalia hats, signs with various obscenities, gay parades with public nudity
and after many of their rallies many sites can be declared toxic waste dumps.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56cc2/56cc221aea3d0a5a9848e6c9e5a8e0a53a536081" alt=""
The left cannot abandon their narrative that Trump was put into the
presidency by Vladimir Putin.
Chris Cillizza claims Trump’s attacks on the media are a distraction
designed to deflect attention away from the Russian connection. He claims, “It's also one that will almost certainly succeed in changing
the subject from Russia and Mike Flynn.”
Dan Rather, an expert on credibility, remarked, “The White House has no
credibility on this issue. Their spigot of lies - can't we finally all agree to
call them lies - long ago lost them any semblance of credibility." Rather suggests that this “crisis” may
be even worse that Watergate. He
commented, “Watergate is the biggest political scandal of my lifetime, until
maybe now.”
NBC’s Chuck Todd, “I'm sorry, delegitimizing the press is
un-American.” Todd did not
criticize President Obama when he attacked Fox News. Fox’s Shepard Smith dredged
up some information he learned in Psychology 101: “It is crazy what we
are watching every day, it is absolutely crazy. He keeps repeating ridiculous throwaway lines that are not
true at all and sort of avoiding this issue of Russia as if we are some kind of
fools for asking the question.” He
followed this with a demand, “we are not fools for asking those questions, and we demand to know the answer to this
question. You owe this to the American people.” It appears the media is in a very demanding mood. Jake Tapper also had a demand for the
President, “Now get to work, and
stop whining about it.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ace0/4ace0845c4a946e0071ae9713a8d55f50fb5b1ca" alt=""
Monday, February 13, 2017
Rutgers Prof Released From Bellevue
![]() |
Nothing Abnormal Here |
Rutgers University professor Kevin Allred was subjected to a psychiatric evaluation because of comments he made in his classroom and on the internet about killing white people. One comment was, “Will the 2nd amendment be as cool when I buy a gun and start shooting at random white people or no…?” He was released from the hospital after only two hours because it was determined that he was not in need of hospitalization. Allred claimed that he was being targeted for his politics when the NYPD came to his Brooklyn home and dropped him off at the Bellevue Hospital psych ward.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4547/a454719ee7b7d19d7d85add09c2ffbefaf5484c1" alt=""
Why is a professor teaching an entire class on Beyoncé and what does
this say about the University? The
course is entitled Politicizing Beyonce: Black Feminism, US Politics, &
Queen Bey. It is apparently a
women’s studies course. It is
claimed that the class is at capacity. Allred said, “They usually sign up
because they're big fans of Beyoncé's music, but they quickly start to make
connections beyond just being fans." Allred says he’s a huge fan of Beyoncé, but he didn’t think
of her as a political actor until he came across an essay by Yale Professor
Daphne Brooks that linked the singer to black, female disempowerment. How Boyoncé is linked to the
deprivation of influence of black females is unclear. However it inspired Allred “to use Beyoncé in my teaching to
spark students' interest in having conversations around gender, sexuality, and
race.” Beyoncé’s music challenges
many of society’s conceptions about gender, sexuality, and race, according to
Allred, who says her prominence gives her political influence. “Beyoncé is a political figure because
she commands attention—perhaps the most attention of any entertainer today.
People listen when she talks and people question things when she raises the
question herself,” he says. While Allred admits her influence isn’t
explicitly governmental or legislative, he says she has the power to inspire cultural
movements for change. Beyoncé has hosted
a high-dollar fundraiser for Barack Obama, is a champion of LGBT equality, and
increasingly highlights feminism in her work. Allred states, “I rather
like the concept of a 'multi-talented performer' who neither plays an
instrument nor writes music. And a 'black feminist' with long blonde hair
dressed as a 1950s burlesque queen singing about bitches.”
Life Used To Be So Simple
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74774/747745ab6db5a6beab4ad0b6d8337ad3a57e44a6" alt=""
Sunday, February 12, 2017
The Elite vs. The People - Immigration
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94323/943238a89979d6e2bad337d221cdecf98887784e" alt=""
The statute dealing with the President’s authority to
control immigration is 8 US Code 1182 - Inadmissible Aliens - (a)(10)
(f). It states, “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any
aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to
the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period
as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of
aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.” It should be clear that the 9th Circuit Court decision
was based on politics. Using this
rationale, any decision made by President Trump can be ruled
unconstitutional. Cardinal Richelieu
is reported to have said, “If you give me six sentences written by the most
innocent of men I will find something in them with which to hang him.” Even 8 US Code 1182 can be twisted to
mean the opposite of its intent.
All of the 7 countries mentioned in the
executive order were labeled "countries of concern" by the Obama
Administration. The federal government has arrested
and convicted 76 people from these seven countries on terrorist
related charges. These people were
not merely arrested. They were
convicted. This number does not
include the unknown number of “refugees” who have gone to the Middle East to
fight for ISIS and other terrorist organizations. They have received training there and
will be allowed to return to the U.S.
The media will do its best to cover for the 9th Circuit. However, the majority of the Americans
will know that this court has put their political beliefs ahead of the security
of the American people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)